Prefill the Basket – Don’t Presell the Customer Twice
posted in Affiliate Marketing |Just thinking out loudly … Which is never a wise thing … I am not 100% convinced the whole presell philosophy always works or is always necessary, especially conversion wise.
Unless after the presell on you website or within a pay per click advert, following the affiliate link actually inserts the product in the shopping basket by prefilling the basket or taking the user directly to the checkout.
I have yet to come across enough programs which prefill the basket after we have presold them on our sites or ppc activity.
Surely this would increase conversion rates as they (meaning the customer) are taken further down the corridor of the sales process … otherwise in effect the customer has to be presold twice?! Once on your site & once again on the merchant site. Where is the logic in that?
I suppose what I am rambling on about is that affiliate links should have the ability to take customers to the checkout and/or shopping basket … for improved CR … they may even soar!
Correct me if i am wrong, but who says you cannot presell a product in 3 lines of ad copy on a ppc search engine and do ppc > merchant?
What’s the better user experience in terms of time & bandwidth for a customer and conversion rates for the affiliate?
a.) ppc > publisher site > merchant … noting no basket prefill thus a product is effectively presold three times
b.) ppc > merchant ….noting again no basket prefill but a product is only presold twice.
That’s why in a.) ie those merchants who allow use of their display url will always have priority over those who don’t permit it. Less leakage & higher % transition of traffic … unless the landing page has an option of several products and ALL take the customer directly to the checkout on the merchants site.
We have the ability to deep link as as we know these generally convert better most of the time, so why don’t networks and merchants take that next step.
btw this is something I brought up on a forum back on January 2nd, 2005. Maybe it illustrates that the industry still hasn’t evolved enough to at least give us the option and try on a larger scale.